Buyer's Guides
Top 6 Gong Alternatives for Revenue Teams (2026)
TL;DR
| Need | Best Pick | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Post-call CRM automation | AskElephant | Starting at $99/mo |
| Enterprise forecasting | Clari | ~$160k+/year |
| Budget transcription | Fireflies.ai | Free–$19/mo |
| Free CI to try | Fathom | Free |
| Meeting collaboration | Avoma | $19–79/mo |
| Simple personal notes | Otter.ai | Free–$20/mo |
Bottom line: If you want insights, Gong is still the leader. If you want action (automatic CRM updates, tasks, handoffs), AskElephant is the strongest option on this list.
Quick Verdict: What are the best Gong alternatives?
This guide is written from the perspective of revenue operations teams evaluating tools based on post-call execution, not general conversation analytics.
For revenue teams that prioritize post-call automation, AskElephant is the strongest option on this list. It goes beyond conversation intelligence to write directly to your CRM, create follow-up tasks, and generate handoff documents—without rep involvement. Among the tools reviewed here, AskElephant delivers the deepest automation for post-call workflows.
If you need enterprise revenue forecasting, Clari is the strongest option. For budget-friendly transcription, Fireflies.ai and Fathom offer solid alternatives at a fraction of Gong's cost. Avoma offers meeting scheduling and collaborative notes, though it lacks the deeper CRM automation of other tools. Otter.ai is the simplest option for individual note-taking.
The key question: do you need insights (what Gong provides) or action (what AskElephant automates)?
Last updated: January 27, 2026
How we ranked these alternatives
This list is ranked by depth of post-call automation, workflow execution, and accessibility for SMB/mid-market teams—criteria that reflect the evolving needs of modern revenue organizations.
We evaluated each tool across four dimensions:
- Automation capabilities: Does the tool take action, or just provide insights?
- CRM integration depth: Surface-level sync vs. direct field updates
- Accessibility: Pricing and team size requirements
- User feedback: G2 ratings and verified reviews
We've included AskElephant in this list and ranked it #1 for automation because that's our core product focus. We're transparent about this bias—see the methodology section at the end for details.
Scope note: This guide focuses specifically on tools for B2B revenue teams—sales, RevOps, and customer success. We don't cover general-purpose transcription for education, legal, or personal use.
Definition: In this guide, "CRM field updates" refers to automatic, structured updates to standard and custom CRM fields (e.g., deal stage, next steps, risk flags, qualification data)—not activity logging, note syncing, or call transcript attachments. This distinction matters because most tools can log that a call happened; fewer can populate specific fields based on call content.
How we evaluated these tools: Feature availability was verified using a combination of public product documentation, vendor demos, customer interviews, and hands-on testing where available. CRM automation claims reflect whether tools automatically write structured data to CRM fields versus logging activities or notes. Pricing was sourced from public pages, customer disclosures, and vendor conversations. G2 ratings were captured in January 2026.
Feature comparison: Gong alternatives
| Feature | AskElephant | Gong | Clari | Avoma | Fireflies | Otter | Fathom |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-Call Automation | |||||||
| Direct CRM field updates | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | Limited | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Auto task creation | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Sales-to-CS handoff docs | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Churn/risk alerts | ✓ | Limited | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Follow-up email drafts | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core CI Features | |||||||
| Call recording | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI transcription | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI summaries | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Searchable library | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Deal intelligence | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Revenue forecasting | ✓ | Limited | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Coaching scorecards | ✓ | ✓ | Limited | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Accessibility | |||||||
| Free tier | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | Limited | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SMB-friendly pricing | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| No seat minimum | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature data based on publicly available documentation and G2 reviews as of January 27, 2026. Vendors update products frequently—verify current capabilities directly before purchasing. See an error? Contact us to request a correction.
Which Gong alternative is best for you?
| If you need... | Best choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Post-call CRM automation | AskElephant | Designed to write directly to CRM fields, not just log activities |
| Enterprise revenue forecasting | Clari | Purpose-built for pipeline and forecast accuracy |
| Deep conversation analytics | Gong | Most mature CI platform with coaching tools |
| Budget-friendly transcription | Fireflies.ai | Free tier + $10-19/user/month |
| Meeting-focused collaboration | Avoma | Scheduling + collaborative notes |
| Free CI to experiment | Fathom | Unlimited free recordings |
| Simple personal notes | Otter.ai | Lowest learning curve |
What does Gong do?
Gong is a conversation intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales calls. It uses AI to surface insights about talk time, customer pain points, competitor mentions, and deal risks—but it stops at analysis. Reps still manually update the CRM after every call.
At its core, Gong helps you understand what's happening in your sales conversations:
- How much are reps talking vs. listening?
- What objections are prospects raising?
- Which deals are at risk based on conversation patterns?
- What coaching opportunities exist?
Along with call summaries, Gong offers deal management features—parsing calls to alert you of at-risk opportunities and recommended next steps.
The limitation? Gong provides visibility, not action. It tells you what happened on the call, but your team still does the manual work of updating systems, creating tasks, and triggering follow-ups. For a detailed breakdown, see our AskElephant vs Gong comparison.
Why would you need a Gong alternative?
Teams look for Gong alternatives because of high pricing (estimated $1,000-2,000/user/year), lack of post-call automation (Gong provides insights but doesn't write to your CRM), and a desire to consolidate their tech stack into fewer tools.
1. Pricing is prohibitive for SMBs and mid-market teams
Gong's pricing, while undisclosed publicly, is estimated at $1,000-2,000 per user per year—often requiring annual upfront payment. For startups and mid-market teams, that's difficult to justify for a tool that only provides conversation intelligence.
There's no package specifically designed for smaller teams. If you're not enterprise-scale, you're paying enterprise prices for features you may not fully use.
2. Insights without action still means manual work
Gong excels at telling you what happened on a call. But knowing and doing are different things.
After every call, your reps still need to:
- Update CRM fields manually
- Create follow-up tasks
- Log next steps and objections
- Prepare handoff documents for CS
That's 5-10 minutes per call of administrative work that Gong doesn't automate. When you're running 8+ calls a day, the productivity drain adds up.
3. Tech consolidation is driving buying decisions
Sales leaders are realizing that standalone tools don't cut it anymore. A conversation intelligence tool that doesn't connect to your CRM automation, your outreach sequences, or your handoff workflows creates friction.
The trend is toward consolidated platforms that handle multiple parts of the revenue process—not single-point solutions that require integration headaches.
1. AskElephant: Best for post-call CRM automation
AskElephant is an AI Revenue Automation Platform that goes beyond call recording to automate what happens after the call—CRM updates, follow-up tasks, handoff documents, and churn alerts. It's the strongest option on this list for teams that prioritize action over insights.
AskElephant's approach is fundamentally different from Gong. Where Gong stops at analysis, AskElephant acts. It listens to your calls and writes directly to HubSpot or Salesforce—updating fields, creating tasks, and triggering workflows without rep involvement.
What are AskElephant's key features?
- Automatic CRM updates: Next steps, objections, and deal details flow to your CRM within minutes of call end
- Sales-to-CS handoff documents: Auto-generated context for customer success teams
- Follow-up task creation: AI creates and assigns tasks based on call content
- Churn and risk alerts: Proactive notifications when conversations signal trouble
- Call recording and AI summaries: Core CI capabilities included
AskElephant: Pros and cons
Pros:
- One of the few tools designed to write directly to CRM fields based on call content, rather than logging activities or notes
- Eliminates 5-10 minutes of manual post-call work per rep
- No seat minimums (works for SMB and mid-market)
- Purpose-built for revenue operations workflows
- Native HubSpot and Salesforce integration
- Teams like Rebuy and Kixie actively use it
Cons:
- Less focused on pure conversation analytics than Gong
- Requires clean CRM setup for optimal automation results
- No free tier for experimentation
- Limited coaching/scorecard features compared to Gong
What does AskElephant cost?
AskElephant pricing: Starting at $99/month. No seat minimums. Enterprise solutions available.
AskElephant is transparent about pricing—starting at $99/month with no seat minimums. Unlike Gong's enterprise-only model, AskElephant works with SMB and mid-market teams.
Who is AskElephant best for?
AskElephant is ideal for revenue teams that need post-call automation—automatic CRM updates, handoff documents, task creation. It's not the best fit if you only need call recording and analytics without workflow automation.
2. Clari: Best for enterprise revenue forecasting
Clari is a revenue platform focused on forecasting, pipeline management, and deal inspection. Following its acquisition of Wingman, it now includes conversation intelligence—but its core strength is predicting revenue, not automating post-call workflows. See our full Clari comparison for more details.
Clari excels where Gong is limited: pipeline visibility and forecasting. If your primary challenge is knowing which deals will close and when, Clari's forecasting engine is more sophisticated than Gong's deal intelligence.
What are Clari's key features?
- Revenue forecasting with AI-powered predictions
- Pipeline inspection and deal health tracking
- Clari Copilot (formerly Wingman) for call recording and summaries
- Activity tracking across sales channels
- Mutual action plans for deal execution
Clari: Pros and cons
Pros:
- Best-in-class revenue forecasting and pipeline visibility
- Strong deal intelligence and risk scoring
- Conversation intelligence included via Clari Copilot
- Trusted by enterprise revenue organizations
- Board-level reporting capabilities
Cons:
- Enterprise pricing (~$160k+/year) excludes SMB/mid-market
- Doesn't automate post-call CRM updates
- Reps still do manual data entry after calls
- Overkill if forecasting isn't your primary need
What does Clari cost?
Clari pricing: Enterprise pricing (contact sales). Estimated $160,000+ annually for enterprise deployments.
Clari is an enterprise tool with enterprise pricing. It's not positioned for SMB or mid-market teams.
Who is Clari best for?
Clari is ideal for enterprise revenue teams that need forecasting, pipeline inspection, and board-level revenue intelligence. It's not the best fit if you need CRM automation or are a smaller team with a limited budget.
3. Avoma: Best for meeting-focused collaboration
Avoma is an AI meeting assistant that combines call recording, transcription, and collaborative note-taking. It's positioned for teams that want meeting scheduling and notes rather than deep sales intelligence or CRM automation. See our full Avoma comparison for more details.
Avoma takes a different approach than Gong—it's built around the meeting as a unit of work, not the call as actionable data. This means features like scheduling and agenda templates, but weaker revenue-focused capabilities compared to dedicated CI tools.
What are Avoma's key features?
- Meeting scheduler with booking pages
- Call recording and transcription
- Collaborative note-taking during meetings
- AI summaries and action items
- CRM sync (requires 10-seat minimum for Business plan)
Avoma: Pros and cons
Pros:
- Meeting scheduling with booking pages
- Lower price than Gong ($19-79/user/month)
- Collaborative note-taking during calls
Cons:
- 10-seat minimum for CRM sync features (expensive barrier)
- No automatic CRM field updates—requires manual data entry
- Not designed for deep sales analytics or revenue intelligence
- Weaker deal intelligence than Gong, Clari, or AskElephant
- Limited post-call workflow automation compared to AskElephant
What does Avoma cost?
Avoma pricing: $19-79/user/month depending on plan.
- Starter: $19/user/month
- Plus: $49/user/month
- Business: $79/user/month (10-seat minimum for CRM features)
Free plan: Limited features available.
Who is Avoma best for?
Avoma may work for small teams focused on meeting scheduling and basic note-taking—but it's not the best fit if you need CRM automation, deep analytics, or revenue intelligence. The 10-seat minimum for CRM features makes it impractical for many teams.
4. Fireflies.ai: Best for budget-friendly transcription
Fireflies.ai is an AI notetaker focused on transcription, search, and basic CRM sync. It's the budget-friendly option for teams that need accurate transcripts without the full conversation intelligence platform. See our full Fireflies comparison for more details.
Fireflies excels at the fundamentals: recording meetings, transcribing accurately, and making conversations searchable. It integrates with most video platforms and offers solid language support.
What are Fireflies.ai's key features?
- Call recording across Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, and more
- AI transcription with high accuracy
- Searchable transcript library
- AI summaries and action items
- Basic CRM sync for logging calls
Fireflies.ai: Pros and cons
Pros:
- Dramatically cheaper than Gong ($10-19/user/month)
- Free tier available for testing
- Broad video platform support
- Good transcription accuracy
- Simple to set up and use
Cons:
- No post-call CRM automation (logging only)
- Limited analytics and coaching features
- Not designed for sales-specific workflows
- Basic deal intelligence compared to Gong
What does Fireflies.ai cost?
Fireflies pricing: Free tier available. Paid plans $10-19/user/month.
- Free: Limited transcription credits
- Pro: $10/user/month
- Business: $19/user/month
Who is Fireflies best for?
Fireflies is ideal for teams that need affordable, accurate transcription and searchable call libraries. It's not the best fit if you need CRM automation or deep conversation analytics.
5. Otter.ai: Best for simple personal transcription
Otter.ai is an AI transcription tool designed for general meeting notes—not specifically for sales. It's the simplest, most lightweight option for individuals who need transcripts without sales-specific features. See our full Otter comparison for more details.
Otter started as a general transcription tool and has added meeting features over time. It's popular with individuals, students, and small teams who need basic note-taking.
What are Otter.ai's key features?
- Real-time transcription during meetings
- Call recording for Zoom, Teams, and Meet
- Note sharing and collaboration
- AI summaries of key points
- Mobile app for on-the-go transcription
Otter.ai: Pros and cons
Pros:
- Simplest interface and fastest onboarding
- Generous free tier (300 minutes/month)
- Works for any meeting type, not just sales
- Good mobile app for on-the-go use
Cons:
- No CRM integration or automation
- Not designed for sales teams
- Limited team collaboration features
- No deal tracking or coaching tools
What does Otter.ai cost?
Otter pricing: Free tier available. Paid plans $8-20/user/month.
- Free: 300 minutes/month
- Pro: $8.33/user/month (billed annually)
- Business: $20/user/month
Who is Otter best for?
Otter is ideal for individuals or small teams that need simple, affordable meeting transcription. It's not the best fit for sales teams needing CRM integration, deal tracking, or team coaching features.
6. Fathom: Best for free CI experimentation
Fathom is a free AI meeting assistant that offers call recording, transcription, and summaries at no cost. It's the best option for teams that want to experiment with conversation intelligence before committing to a paid platform.
Fathom's free tier is genuinely useful—not a limited trial. You get unlimited recordings, AI summaries, and basic CRM integration without paying anything.
What are Fathom's key features?
- Unlimited free recordings (no time limits)
- AI-generated summaries and action items
- Searchable transcript library
- Basic CRM integration (Salesforce, HubSpot)
- One-click highlight clips for sharing
Fathom: Pros and cons
Pros:
- Actually free with unlimited recordings
- No credit card required to start
- Solid AI summaries and action items
- Basic CRM logging included
- Highest G2 rating (5.0/5)
Cons:
- No post-call CRM automation (logging only)
- Limited analytics and team features
- Paid tiers needed for advanced capabilities
- Not built for enterprise sales workflows
What does Fathom cost?
Fathom pricing: Free tier available. Paid plans $15-29/user/month.
- Free: Unlimited recordings, basic features
- Premium: $15/user/month
- Team Edition: $19/user/month
- Team Edition Pro: $29/user/month
Who is Fathom best for?
Fathom is ideal for teams that want to experiment with conversation intelligence before committing to enterprise tools. It's not the best fit for teams needing advanced analytics, CRM automation, or sales-specific coaching features.
Real-world use cases: When to choose each alternative
Use Case 1: Eliminating manual CRM updates after every call
The problem: Your reps spend 5-10 minutes after every call updating deal stage, next steps, and qualification fields. Pipeline data is often stale or incomplete.
Best solution: AskElephant
Example workflow:
- Rep finishes a discovery call on Zoom or Microsoft Teams
- AskElephant automatically captures key details (budget, timeline, decision-makers)
- HubSpot or Salesforce fields update within minutes—no rep action required
- Manager sees accurate pipeline without chasing reps
Why not Gong: Gong provides call insights but requires reps to manually transfer findings to the CRM.
Use Case 2: Seamless sales-to-CS handoffs
The problem: Customer success inherits deals with incomplete context. They spend the first call re-asking questions sales already covered.
Best solution: AskElephant
Example workflow:
- Deal closes in HubSpot or Salesforce
- AskElephant auto-generates a handoff document from all sales calls
- Document includes: pain points, success criteria, key stakeholders, timeline
- CS rep has full context before the first onboarding call
Why not Gong: Gong records calls but doesn't generate structured handoff documents.
Use Case 3: Enterprise revenue forecasting
The problem: You need accurate pipeline predictions for board reporting. Manual inspection isn't scalable.
Best solution: Clari
Example workflow:
- Clari pulls data from CRM, email, and calendar
- AI identifies deals at risk based on activity patterns
- Forecast updates in real-time with confidence scores
- Leadership gets accurate commit numbers without spreadsheet wrangling
Why not AskElephant: AskElephant focuses on post-call automation rather than enterprise forecasting models. If forecasting is your primary need, Clari is the stronger choice.
Use Case 4: Proactive churn risk detection
The problem: You only learn about unhappy customers when they cancel. By then, it's too late.
Best solution: AskElephant
Example workflow:
- Customer mentions frustration, competitor evaluation, or budget cuts on a call
- AskElephant detects risk signals and creates a Slack alert
- CS manager intervenes within 24 hours
- Escalation happens before the renewal conversation
Why not Gong: Gong can surface sentiment in analytics dashboards, but doesn't trigger real-time alerts to Slack or create follow-up tasks.
Use Case 5: Budget-friendly transcription for small teams
The problem: You need call transcription and basic AI summaries, but enterprise tools cost more than your entire software budget.
Best solution: Fireflies.ai or Fathom
Example workflow:
- Connect Fireflies or Fathom to your calendar
- Bot joins calls automatically and records
- Get AI transcription and summaries within minutes
- Share highlights with team via Slack or email
Why not AskElephant: If you only need transcription without CRM automation, Fireflies' free tier or Fathom's unlimited free plan is more cost-effective. AskElephant's value is in the automation layer.
Frequently asked questions
About this comparison
This guide was written by Woody Klemetson, CEO & Co-founder of AskElephant. We've included AskElephant in this list and ranked it #1 for post-call automation because that's our core product focus—and we believe it's the strongest option for teams that need action, not just insights.
Our evaluation sources:
- Public pricing pages and vendor documentation
- G2 verified reviews and ratings (as of January 27, 2026)
- Direct product testing and vendor demos
- User feedback from revenue teams
G2 profile links:
- AskElephant on G2 (4.9/5)
- Gong on G2 (4.8/5)
- Clari on G2 (4.6/5)
- Avoma on G2 (4.6/5)
- Fireflies.ai on G2 (4.8/5)
- Otter.ai on G2 (4.4/5)
- Fathom on G2 (5.0/5)
Pricing note: Pricing ranges in this guide are based on public reporting, customer disclosures, and vendor conversations as of January 2026. Exact pricing may vary based on team size, contract terms, and negotiation.
Feature claims: Feature comparisons are based on public documentation and vendor demos as of January 2026. Capabilities may have changed since publication.
We've aimed to be honest about where competitors excel (Gong for analytics, Clari for forecasting, Fathom for free access) while being clear about AskElephant's strengths and limitations. If you disagree with our ranking or have feedback, contact us.
Related articles
- How to Automate CRM Updates from Sales Calls — Step-by-step guide to eliminating post-call data entry
- What Should Be Included in a Sales-to-CS Handoff Document? — Best practices for seamless customer transitions
- How to Predict Customer Churn Before It Happens — Using conversation signals to identify at-risk accounts
- AskElephant vs Gong: Full Comparison — Detailed breakdown of features, pricing, and use cases
If post-call automation sounds useful for your team, you can request a demo here.